🔗 Share this article

The nation's bold move to ban social media access for those under 16 is creating waves around the globe. Politicians, safety advocates, and families are watching with great interest to see if this approach will set a precedent for other nations.

European Movement

Across Europe, a rising chorus of states are considering similar measures.

• Denmark has announced a restriction on social media for children under fifteen, with the prime minister arguing that phones and apps are "stealing our kids' childhood". The policy could be passed next year.
• The Norwegian government is preparing to introduce a access barrier of 15, highlighting the need to shield young people from the "influence of the recommendation systems".
• Ireland is working on a online verification tool to authenticate the identity and age of social media users. Officials have suggested that an similar ban remains "an options on the table".
• In The Spanish government, the president has asked parliament to approve a proposal increasing the access age for joining social media to 16.
• In France, the president has proposed a ban for under-15s, and a parliamentary commission has endorsed a comparable step, potentially involving an overnight "screen time restriction" for adolescents.
• The administration in The Dutch government has urged guardians to block their youngsters from social media before 15.

Across the European Union, the bloc's legislature has passed a symbolic motion demanding a ban for teenagers under 16 except if parental consent is given. Even though it highlights of the "addictive" nature of these apps, the move does not enact enforceable legislation.

"A clear age barrier is a useful starting point," said the European lawmaker driving the measure.

The United Kingdom: A Cautious Approach

In the UK, the administration has kept open a possible ban, emphasizing that "no measure is discarded" but stressing any decision must be "supported by robust research".

Earlier, momentum grew behind a proposal to introduce limits on social media use by teenagers, but it was in the end modified. Instead, the administration committed to investigate the topic.

Charities have raised apprehensions. One foundation founded by the family of a girl who was lost after viewing harmful platform posts contends that a simple age ban may not make platforms safer and could create a "sudden drop-off" of exposure when teens reach the legal age.

"The Australian ban is a reaction to the inability of the Silicon Valley to design products and services that are safe and age appropriate for children," said a influential peer.

The US: A Decentralized Picture

Across America, action is largely unfolding at the local level against a backdrop of national stalemate.

• Utah mandates parental consent for under-18s to use social media and restricts nighttime use.
• The state of Florida has passed a bill banning under-14s from joining social media, though it is entangled in court battles.
• Virginia has enacted a rule limiting under-16s to 60 minutes of social media access per day, with any further time needing parental permission.
• The state of Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana have also passed bills demanding adult authorization for under-16s to set up social media presences.

Despite cross-party agreement and suggestions from certain politicians to follow Australia's lead, a federal ban is right now seen as a distant prospect.

Worldwide Perspectives

Beyond Europe and the US, additional nations are similarly considering moves.

• Malaysia intends to ban social media for those under sixteen effective next year.
• Brazil has increased the access age for the platform Instagram to 16.

However, international organizations strike a more cautious stance. Unicef has cautioned that social media bans pose dangers and "could have unintended consequences". The agency points out that online platforms can be a "critical link" for isolated children and that bans should not be a "replacement" for tech companies to improve safety.

Even as this international discussion unfolds, the policies of this nation and others indicate that states globally are less and less willing to delay for tech companies to make changes on their own.